top of page
Tom Monto

Average of 6 candidates running in elections now, FPTP's Achilles' heel

Our present First Past The Post voting system works best - wastes the fewest votes on average, produces the representation of the larges portion of voters - when only two candidates are in the running.


But on average more than six candidates run in each district in today's federal elections.


For that reason we need multi-member districts where a large number of seats allow the range of sentiment among district voters to be represented.


With that many candidates, vote splitting means that large affiliated voting blocks do not get the representation they are due, and that often the candidate elected does not have proven support from a majority of the voters. This create minority rule at least in the district.


Five to ten seats is a common number elected under STV. And that is the range that was used in most Canadian STV elections in the past.


There were instances of election of two or three as well. Sometimes one party took all the seats in those districts, but sometimes they produced mixed representation that was more more fair than seen in the single winners under FPTP. But the results were not as fair as those produced by elections that filled a larger number of seats through transferable voting (STV).

===============================================

Thanks for reading.

Check out my blog "List of Montopedia blogs concerning electoral reform" to find other blogs on this important subject. As well, please consider purchasing my booklet "When Canada Had Effective Voting" STV in Western Canada 1917-1971. 68-page overview of Canada's PR experience in the last century - the fight for proportional representation, the adoption of STV by 20 cities and two provincial governments in the 1920s, and STV's final use in a government election, in the 1971 Calgary city election. Available through AbeBooks.com or email me at montotom@yahoo.ca ---------------------------------------------------------------

This year is the:

* 100th Anniversary of United Farmers of Alberta party being elected on promise to bring in electoral reform, a promise fulfilled three years later.

* 50th anniversary of the last STV city election in Canada. Calgary elected 14 city councillors through STV, and then switched to FPTP for city elections. By that time, more than 54 years after the first STV city election, anyone old enough to have voted using X voting in a city election would have had to be 75 years old.

* 50th Anniversary of election of Lougheed's Progressive-Conservatives. With only 46 percent of the vote they took more than 60 percent of the seats. NDP received 11 percent of the vote but elected just one (Grant Notley), instead of the nine MLAs it was due.

====================================================

What is STV?

From a 1902 reform magazine: "Thinking it well to have in every number something by way of a brief explanation of proportional voting, I repeat in this number the following. Proportional representation means the use of a reasonable and scientific system of voting instead of the present stupid, unfair and inefficient procedure. Methods: There are several systems by which the principle of proportional representation may be given effect to. Large electoral districts, each electing several members, are a necessary feature. The "quota" plan is usually employed. It means that a quota of the votes elects one representative. To arrive at the quota, the number of valid votes cast is divided by the number of seats to be filled. For instance in a seven-member district any one-seventh of the voters could elect one representative and the other six-sevenths could not interfere with their choice. The three principal systems of proportional representation are the Free List as used in Switzerland and Belgium [party-list pro-rep], the Hare system as used in Tasmania [STV], and the Gove System as advocated in Massachusetts. The Preferential Vote [Alternative Voting/Instant Run-off Voting] -- This is used in the election of single officers such as a mayor. It is not strictly a form of pro-rep but is akin thereto, and uses part of the same voting methods. The object of preferential voting is to encourage the free nomination of candidates and to obtain always a clear majority at one balloting, no matter how many candidates are nominated." (From the Proportional Representation Review Dec. 1902, p. 77) (Hathi Trust online resource, page 81/180) Thanks for reading. ========================================================


2 views

Recent Posts

See All

Комментарии


bottom of page